![]() Let’s see whether the table feature and images are implementedīetter than in CK or TinyMCE. You can write pluginsįor this editor, as well as for CK or TinyMCE. Actually after evaluating the WYSIWYGs inĢ016 we decided to go with Froala and didn't regret our choice since. Just because something costs money, it doesn't mean it's bad though. Interesting sidenote: When I first wrote this article in 2016, the pricing was a bit different with $99, $299 and The next option will be a paid one, so if your solution doesn't need toīut to summarize on TinyMCE: I find it quite ok for that it's free and open source and would certainly prefer itĪhh isn’t this a bliss? Start’s really nicely. Also, Wordpress has to use open sourceĬode in order to be able to distribute it. Quite a while and so has TinyMCE and it thus just might be a legacy choice. So if TinyMCE is goodĮnough for Wordpress, it will surely be good enough for you? Well, consider that Wordpress has been around for They use TinyMCE with an external button to upload media. Media" button yourself won't be too hard. I tried to Googleįor a workaround, but wasn’t finding anything fast, which is usually a bad sign. Think it should at least provide the interface and explain how you can wire it to your server. Of course, for any image upload to a server, the editor can’t do it by itself, but I Really handy of course, since I always upload my images first to another server, before using them on the actual So all-in-all the TinyMCE table experience is quite satisfactory. The inserted table looks nice and I get user friendly options to edit Inserting the table is nice and intuitive. If you haven’t given this too much thought, Than finding an obscure icon for everything that no-one understands. What I like about it at first glance, is that they use text-labels for non-obvious parts of the editor, rather So at first sight TinyMCE looks a bit more modern than the CKEditor. Is not that bad, computers get faster, but some people in the community don’t like it. The name means it was “Tiny Many Centuries Earlier”. ![]() So let's move onwards to new adventures with TinyMCE. The FCKEditor named after it’s creator Frederico Caldeira Knabben, but then they noticed fck is too close to By the way, did you know that the CKEditor used to be Whether you find this good or bad depends on what you want. For example a tick (‘) is left alone by most editors, while CK converts it to '. One other thing I noticed, is that CK is more aggressively converting your input So what are the good parts about theĬKEditors? Well, there are plugins, it’s customizable and it’s got broad adoption so you’ll find some help for Want to waste anymore space, so I’ll not post more CKEditor popup dialogs. Somewhat ease the pain? Every other editor I found doesn’t display it like this.Īnyways, let’s move on and insert an image:Īgain, we are confronted with a beautifully designed dialog. Yes, I know this is how browsers render tables historically, but couldn’t the editor ![]() The next atrocity follows once you have the table input inserted: I think this interface speaks for itself. However, things like inserting a table are still very archaic, even in the newest version: Still, it's not the most prettyĮditor out there in my opinion. In terms of design, it's come a long way since its early days. It's been around for a long time, which might explain how it got to it's market leading position. Google trendsĬonfirms this compared to it’s main competitor TinyMCE. The CKEditor is the most broadly adopted WYSIWYG editor nowadays. Recently, competitors like Trix Editor and QuillJS have been on the rise. ![]() The grandfathers of WYSIWYGs for HTML are the CKEditorĪnd TinyMCE. There are different out of the box WYSIWYG’s for the web. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |